CHAPTER EIGHT
The Bureaucracy
Study
Bureaucracy, a form of
hierarchical organization that aspires to neutral
competence, is everywhere today, in the private as well as the public
sphere. Bureaucratic decision making can be more efficient and expert in many
cases than democratic decision making. The central problem of bureaucracy is accountability. The Pendleton Act and the Hatch Act have moved the federal
bureaucracy from the patronage-based
spoils system of the nineteenth
century to a civil service based on
merit. Red tape, though cumbersome
and irritating, also helps increase accountability by providing a paper trail
and eliminating the discretion of lower-level bureaucrats to do their jobs in
an idiosyncratic way.
The U.S. bureaucracy has grown from
just three cabinet departments at
the founding to a gigantic apparatus of fifteen cabinet-level departments and
hundreds of independent agencies, independent regulatory boards and
commissions, and government
corporations. This growth has been in response to the expansion of the
nation, the politics of special economic and social clientele groups, and the emergence of new problems that require
solutions and regulations.
Many observers believe that the bureaucracy
should simply administer the laws the political branches have enacted. In
reality, the agencies of the bureaucracy make government policy, using bureaucratic discretion to interpret
the laws of Congress and to make new regulations, which are then published in
the Federal
Register, and they play the roles of judge and jury in enforcing those
policies.
Bureaucratic
culture
refers to how agencies operate--their assumptions, values, and habits,
including their reliance on a formal and confusing language called
bureaucratese. The bureaucratic culture increases employees’ belief in the
programs they administer, their commitment to the
survival and growth of their agencies, and the tendency to rely on rules and
procedures rather than goals, but it can also lead to the kinds of mistakes and
conflicts of interest sometimes exposed by whistleblowers.
Agencies work actively for their political
survival. They attempt to establish strong support outside the agency, to avoid
direct competition with other agencies, and to jealously guard their own policy
jurisdictions. Presidential powers are only modestly effective in controlling
the bureaucracy. The affected clientele groups working in close cooperation
with the agencies and the congressional committees that oversee them form
powerful iron triangles and issue networks.
Regardless of what the public may think, the U.S.
bureaucracy is actually quite responsive and competent when compared with the
bureaucracies of other countries. Citizens can increase this responsiveness by
taking advantage of opportunities for gaining access to bureaucratic decision
making, such as citizen advisory
councils, sunshine laws, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Privacy Act of 1974.
Learning
Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should
understand
- the definition
of bureaucracy
- the evolution,
organization, and roles of the federal bureaucracy
- politics
inside the bureaucracy
- the
relationship between the federal bureaucracy and the branches of the
federal government.
Materials developed by Matthew J. Streb,
Northern Illinois University
|